SCA FOCUS
Built by Experienced GP Educators

The Complete SCA Package.

Access to 240+ cases AI feedback in minutes GP Reviews available on request

Passing the SCA isn't just about knowing more medicine. It's about demonstrating the consultation skills RCGP examiners assess: exploring and addressing ICE, shared decision-making, managing uncertainty and responding to patient emotion. Record as often as you like, get a consultation marked by AI in minutes, and send the ones that matter to an experienced GP for clear, personalised feedback on what you actually did, so you know what to improve before exam day.

1 August 2026·Doctor: Dr S. Whitfield·Patient: Amy Clarke·Marked by Dr P. Hargreaves
Predicted Score
7/10.5Pass
Score Distribution
Data Gathering2/3
Clinical Management3/4.5
Relating to Others2/3
Examiner's Overall Summary

A solid consultation with good clinical instincts. The RCP 3 questions were used well and the step-up to a combination inhaler was appropriate and clearly explained. The steroid concern was identified and addressed. Where marks were lost was in the detail. Inhaler technique was mentioned but not properly assessed: the examiner was left unsure whether the candidate understood why the technique was suboptimal or what specifically to correct. The written asthma action plan was issued but its structure was not explained to the patient in a way that would make it useful at home. The candidate should also have asked about occupational exposures given this is adult-onset worsening asthma.

Voice note
PassData Gathering & Diagnosis

Good use of the RCP 3 questions to establish uncontrolled asthma. SABA frequency, night symptoms, and activity limitation were all covered. Preventer adherence was explored and the walk-in episode was picked up from the history. Inhaler technique was mentioned but not examined in enough detail to assess what the actual fault was. Occupational history was not asked: the candidate established the patient works from home but did not ask specifically whether symptoms relate to the working environment, which is a standard question in adult asthma.

PassClinical Management

Appropriate step-up from ICS alone to ICS/LABA combination. Choice of Fostair and explanation of MART was accurate. Peak flow was measured. Spacer was recommended and referral to the asthma nurse was made. The written asthma action plan was issued but the candidate did not explain the green, amber, and red zones in a way that would enable the patient to use it independently. Safety-netting around acute episodes was present but did not include guidance on what to do in the first 24 hours of an upper respiratory infection, which is when this patient is most at risk.

PassRelating to Others

The steroid concern was picked up and addressed clearly, and the patient was visibly reassured. ICE was explored. The candidate made a good observation that the steroid concern likely contributed to non-adherence. However, when the patient expressed that she missed yoga, the opportunity to build on this as a motivating goal was passed over quickly. The consultation was well-structured and the patient left informed. Checking the patient's understanding of the action plan at the end would have strengthened the closing.

Skills Assessment
Golden MinuteNeeds Improvement

She was interrupted roughly fifteen seconds in, on the word “walk-in”, to pin down the date of the steroid course. The date mattered less than what she was about to say next.

Next time: Let the opening run until she stops on her own. Dates can be fixed once she has finished.

Open QuestionNeeds Improvement

The consultation moved to closed questions early. The RCP 3 screen was asked as three direct questions in a row, which got the answers but closed down what she might have added.

Next time: Open with one broad question about how the asthma affects her week, then use the screen to fill whatever gaps she leaves.

Cue RecognitionGood

“I’m a bit worried about where things are heading” was picked up rather than passed over, and it was the thread that led to the steroid concern later.

History StructureGood

Control, adherence, technique and triggers were covered in an order that built on itself, and the prescription data was used to test the history rather than replace it.

Explores IdeasGood

She was asked directly what she thought was going on with her asthma, before any explanation was offered, so the explanation could start from where she actually was.

Explores ConcernsGood

Her worry about steroids was drawn out rather than waited for, and the specific belief behind it, that the inhaler carries the same risk as the tablets, was named.

Explores ExpectationsNeeds Improvement

She was never asked what she was hoping for. Her question about an alternative to the steroid inhaler came from her, late, and it had been her reason for booking.

Next time: Ask what she was hoping would come out of today before moving to management. It is usually one sentence and it reframes everything after it.

Managing ICEGood

The steroid concern was answered before the new inhaler was proposed, not after, so she was not asked to accept a decision she had already decided to be anxious about.

EmpathyGood

Her worry was treated as reasonable rather than corrected, and giving up Thursday yoga was acknowledged as a loss rather than logged as a symptom.

Explanation QualityGood

The difference between inhaled and oral steroids was explained in terms of dose and where the drug goes, and MART was described as one inhaler replacing two, which is the part that matters to her.

Shared Decision MakingGood

Fostair was offered with its reasoning and she was given room to agree rather than told. Her own goal of getting back to yoga was used as the measure of whether it works.

Safety NettingNeeds Improvement

A written action plan was promised and the 999 threshold was mentioned, but the zones were not explained, so she left with a plan she could not use on her own.

Next time: Walk through green, amber and red once, in her words, and check she can say back what she would do after a cold.

Time ManagementGood

Twelve minutes covered control, adherence, technique, the steroid concern and a plan, with a summary at nine and a half minutes that left room for her last question.

Time Assessment

11:25

Doctor 53%Patient 28%Silence
First third
Doctor 37%Patient 47%
Middle third
Doctor 56%Patient 22%
Final third
Doctor 67%Patient 14%

240+ Realistic SCA Cases

Cases written and reviewed by practising GPsData gathering and clinical management tips on every caseTrainer insight: commonly asked questions and misconceptions clarified

All SCA Focus packages include 240+ realistic SCA cases, designed to mimic the exam. Each centres around a genuine patient dilemma to work through in twelve minutes. Afterwards you get a predicted score and specific feedback with pointers on how to improve. Each case also carries the reading behind it: how to take the history, how to manage the problem, a worked example of the conversation, a model consultation to listen to, and a trainer insight from a practising GP with high yield tips. The package is designed to give you real exam confidence and to boost your exam performance.

Every step is designed to help you improve.

Record Consultation

Record

AI Review

GP Review

Report

Record directly on the SCA Focus website with your study partners. No third-party software required.

What trainees say

DO

Dr Amara Osei

North West VTS · August 2026

“

The GP review made all the difference. I finally understood why I was losing marks on ICE, not just that I was.

DR

Dr Callum Reyes

May 2026

“

Recording with a study partner felt exactly like the real thing. The feedback was specific enough to actually act on before exam day.

DC

Dr Priya Chandran

Yorkshire and Humber VTS · February 2026

“

I used the case bank every week for two months. Passed first time and genuinely think the personalised comments were the reason why.

Pricing

Starter

Starter pack to identify strengths and weaknesses. Access to all 240+ cases and 120 instant AI reviews.

£90

One-off payment · 4 months access

  • 240+ realistic SCA stations
  • Unlimited recording and transcription
  • 120 AI-graded consultations
  • 4 months access

Premium

Access to the entire case bank and enough AI reviews to cover the entire bank. Includes 5 GP reviews.

£210

One-off payment · 4 months access

  • 240+ realistic SCA stations
  • Unlimited recording and transcription
  • 300 AI-graded consultations
  • 5 consultations reviewed by a GP
  • 4 months access

Intensive

Access to the entire case bank and enough AI reviews to cover the entire bank. Includes 12 GP reviews, for GP registrars seeking tailored feedback and support.

£295

One-off payment · 4 months access

  • 240+ realistic SCA stations
  • Unlimited recording and transcription
  • 350 AI-graded consultations
  • 12 consultations reviewed by a GP
  • 4 months access

Have questions? Read our FAQ or email mrcgpexplained@outlook.com